JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)November 19, 2008

A- de 2008

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Humberto Antonio Sierra Porto

✓Claimant Gustavo Adolfo Hernández Quiñónez Y Jairo Ernesto Escobar Sánz Vs. Magistrados De La Sala Jurisdiccional Disciplinaria Del Consejo Superior Seccional De La Judicatura De Antioquia

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Suscitado Entre El Tribunal Superior De Medellín –Sala Penal- Y El Consejo De Estado –Sala De Lo Contencioso Administrativo, Sección Quinta- Se Resolvió Remitir La Acción De La Referencia Al Tribunal Superior De Medellín –Sala Penal- Para Le Dé Trámite Y Decida De Forma Inmediata
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Juez De Tutela
  • No corresponde determinar a priori contra quienes debe dirigirse la acción
Acción De Tutela
  • Competencia Tribunal Superior de Distrito Judicial
4 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (2 points)
  1. Primero. Remitase el expediente contentivo de la accion de tutela propuesta por los ciudadanos Adolfo Hernandez Quinonez y Jairo Ernesto Escobar Sanz contra la DIRECCION EJECUTIVA DE LA ADMINISTRACION JUDICIAL DE LA RAMA JUDICIAL DEL PODER PUBLICO y la DIRECCION EJECUTIVA DE LA ADMINISTRACION JUDICIAL SECCIONAL ANTIOQUIA, al Tribunal Superior de Medellin -Sala Penal-, para que le de tramite y decida en forma inmediata.
  2. Segundo. Por Secretaria General COMUNIQUESE al Consejo de Estado -Sala de lo Contencioso Administrativo, Seccion Quinta-, la decision adoptada en esta providencia, con el fin de que tenga conocimiento sobre lo aqui resuelto por la Corte Constitucional en relacion con el conflicto de competencia
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.